I had a patch that introduced shims, which included shims to make Pig work with 19. It's woefully out of date at this point, but you can at least use it as a starting point: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-924
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Daniel Dai <[email protected]> wrote: > There are some API incompatible changes between 0.19 and 0.20. You will > need to change current Pig code in order to compile/run against 0.19. But > the cost of downgrade hadoop should be much lower than write a new backend. > You can check PIG-660 (in which we upgrade hadoop 18 to 20) to get some > idea. > > Daniel > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:01 AM, devdoer bird <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If possible I want to use the official pig distribution, but the > company's > > hadoop (from hadoop 0.19) backend has changed a lot of api from the > > official one which I can't get the documentaion. > > > > I tried to fix the imcompatial problem by making pig 0.9.1 work with > > official hadoop 0.19 ,then work with my company's private hadoop > > distribution . But I don't where to begin. > > > > Any help will be welcome. > > > > 2012/1/9 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> > > > > > What error did you see when you use official Pig distribution? It's > > > non-trivial to write a backend even if possible (Especially for 0.5, it > > > would be hard to get help from the community) > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:16 AM, devdoer bird <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > So I think Streaming backend may be a good solution for this > situation. > > > > > > > > 2012/1/9 devdoer bird <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > The reason I decide use Streaming as backend is that In my company > > the > > > > > hadoop has been modified so it might not be compatible with the > > > official > > > > > hadoop distribution. And I can't make the pig run on our private > > > hadoop > > > > > distribution. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2012/1/9 Daniel Dai <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > >> Pig do have a abstraction layer in execution engine. But that is > > > mostly > > > > a > > > > >> legacy of early versions. In recent development, we never keep > > > platform > > > > >> neutral in mind so I don't know how reliable this interface is. > Can > > > you > > > > >> elaborate your idea so we may find a better solution? > > > > >> > > > > >> Daniel > > > > >> > > > > >> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:50 PM, devdoer bird <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > HI: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I want to implement a new pig backend . Can I replache the > hadoop > > > > >> backend > > > > >> > with a hadoop--streaming only backend? > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I decide to use streaming to implement backend.storage and > backend > > > > >> > .executionengine interface , but I want to know whether it's a > > > right > > > > >> way > > > > >> > to do so. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Thanks. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
