I suggest when it comes time to vote we pick our top 5 and rank order them. We can give 5 points to the first choice, 4 points to the second, etc. The top 5 point getters could then be announced and we could vote based on those.
I'm assuming the decision will be a committer vote but do we want some public discussion before this vote? Ultimately I think its a personal preference thing and one is unlikely to be persuaded by a group discussion. IMO there are at least 4 or 5 logos that I'm more then happy with. Its just a matter of finding the one that has the broadest appeal. Sean On 8/15/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree. IMHO, limiting this to one entry per person will only stifle creativeness and may lead to rampant dissociative disorders, including, but not limited to -- The infamous dakotajack syndrome (read: multiple personality disorder ;) -- James Mitchell 678.910.8017 On Aug 14, 2006, at 7:32 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote: > On 8/14/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Forward ... >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Aug 14, 2006 4:24 PM >> Subject: Logo contest >> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]> >> >> >> I have a question, >> >> did we allow users to upload as many logos as they want? >> I more like the idea of "one user, one shot". > > > We didn't impose any such restriction, and indeed we've received > several > alternative approaches from several of the submittors ... it would > be unfair > to make them go back and choose only one submission at this point -- > especially as we haven't really given any advice on what our decision > criteria are going to be :-). > > Craig > > Just my $0.02 >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> further stuff: >> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> further stuff: >> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf >> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com >>
