The requirement for a CLA was mentioned at some point. If that is a
requirement we should probably filter out al entries for which a CLA
has not been filed. Then we could give each remaining entry a number
and issue a vote like this:
[ ] 1 (Link)
[ ] 2 (Link)
Please check your top 5 choices.
From that list we could list the 5 choices with the most votes and
perhaps make another vote based on that.
As far as community involvement I'd say let's do it the same as with
releases. Anybody can vote, but the PMC votes are binding.
Greg
On Aug 17, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
I suggest when it comes time to vote we pick our top 5 and rank order
them. We can give 5 points to the first choice, 4 points to the
second, etc. The top 5 point getters could then be announced and we
could vote based on those.
I'm assuming the decision will be a committer vote but do we want some
public discussion before this vote? Ultimately I think its a personal
preference thing and one is unlikely to be persuaded by a group
discussion.
IMO there are at least 4 or 5 logos that I'm more then happy with.
Its just a matter of finding the one that has the broadest appeal.
Sean
On 8/15/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree. IMHO, limiting this to one entry per person will only
stifle creativeness and may lead to rampant dissociative disorders,
including, but not limited to -- The infamous dakotajack syndrome
(read: multiple personality disorder ;)
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 14, 2006, at 7:32 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> On 8/14/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Forward ...
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Aug 14, 2006 4:24 PM
>> Subject: Logo contest
>> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>> I have a question,
>>
>> did we allow users to upload as many logos as they want?
>> I more like the idea of "one user, one shot".
>
>
> We didn't impose any such restriction, and indeed we've received
> several
> alternative approaches from several of the submittors ... it would
> be unfair
> to make them go back and choose only one submission at this
point --
> especially as we haven't really given any advice on what our
decision
> criteria are going to be :-).
>
> Craig
>
> Just my $0.02
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> further stuff:
>> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> further stuff:
>> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>>
