Hi

As far as I am concerned, Clay can do whatever Facelets can do and then some.

Hermod

-----Original Message-----
From: Randahl Fink Isaksen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 1:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Shale and facelets vs. Shale and Clay


Has anyone seen a comparison chart on the net somewhere? I have been 
googling for some more information about what clay can and cannot do in 
comparison to what facelets can and cannot do.

I have been testing facelets for some time now, but I would like to find 
out if it is worth the effort to have a go at clay as well. I feel 
certain we will be using Shale, so the question is what support 
technology we will combine Shale with... Facelets or Clay.

Randahl


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> 1. Yes, Shale does not depend on Clay in any way - Actually it is almost true 
> the other way around too, bar some Shale utility function that is uses.
> 2. One of the greatest advantages is that Clay supports the OO paradigm with 
> inheritance, where Facelets only supports composition.
>
> You seem to have some misconception here. Shale is a framework on top of ANY 
> JSF implementation, much like Struts is a framework on top of JSP/Servlets. 
> Clay works just as well with MyFaces as it does with Sun's JSF reference 
> implementation
>
> I have tested and used both, and finally landed on Clay due to 2.
>
> Hermod
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randahl Fink Isaksen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:04 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Shale and facelets vs. Shale and Clay
>
>
> Has anyone got any impressions of the two different combinations shale + 
> facelets and shale + clay? In particular I was wondering:
>
> 1. Is shale *completely* separated from clay so that using facelets 
> instead of clay does not break anything?
> 2. Has clay got any advantages over facelets when used with shale 
> because clay was built for shale whereas facelets is meant for any JSF 
> platform?
>
> Randahl
>
>
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> This email with attachments is solely for the use of the individual or
> entity to whom it is addressed. Please also be aware that DnB NOR cannot
> accept any payment orders or other legally binding correspondence with
> customers as a part of an email. 
>
> This email message has been virus checked by the anti virus programs used
> in the DnB NOR Group.
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
>
>
>   

Reply via email to