Hi, I am interested to discuss new features to a future version of Shale and I would like to know if there is interest on discussing them; if so, please reply.
Meanwhile, I am writing down the details. Un abrazo, Vladimir. PS: Sorry for my english :( --- Dick Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been trying to get my Tiles app working with > the current Shale release (thanks Craig and Greg for > your help), and am currently working with the > shale-framework-20061116 jars. My running version > used only the shale-framework-20061004 jars. I have > discovered that I can use the 20061116 shale-tiles > and tiles-core with the 20061004 Shale release, and > have successfully implemented the Tiles 2 FAQ > changes. > > Once I replace my 20061004 shale-xxx jars (except > for the two newer Tiles jars) with the 20061116 jars > my app fails like before with this log data: > > INFO: Undeploying context [/starraShale] > log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger > (org.apache.commons.digester.Digester.sax). > log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system > properly. > Nov 17, 2006 10:14:26 AM > org.apache.tiles.listener.TilesListener > contextInitialized > INFO: Initializing TilesListener > Nov 17, 2006 10:14:26 AM > org.apache.tiles.listener.TilesListener > readFactoryConfig > INFO: CONFIG FILES DEFINED IN WEB.XML > Nov 17, 2006 10:14:26 AM > org.apache.tiles.listener.TilesListener > initDefinitionsFactory > INFO: initializing definitions factory... > SaInitializer.contextInitialized > Nov 17, 2006 10:14:26 AM > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start > SEVERE: Error filterStart > Nov 17, 2006 10:14:26 AM > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start > SEVERE: Context [/starraShale] startup failed due to > previous errors > > My log4j is as follows: > > log4j.debug=true > log4j.appender.C1=org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender > log4j.appender.C1.Threshold=DEBUG > log4j.appender.C1.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout > log4j.appender.C1.layout.ConversionPattern=%d - %p > %c - %m%n > log4j.rootLogger=DEBUG, C1# test > log4j.logger.com.ibatis=DEBUG, C1 > log4j.logger.java.sql=DEBUG, C1 > log4j.logger.org.apache.commons.digester.Digester.sax=DEBUG, > C1 > log4j.logger.org.apache.shale=DEBUG, C1 > log4j.logger.org.apache.catalina.core=DEBUG, C1 > log4j.logger.org.apache.jasper.compiler=DEBUG, C1 > log4j.logger.com.starrcs=TRACE, C1 > > As a test I reduced my shale lib jars to shale-core, > shale-tiles, and tiles-core. This configuration > works with the 20061004 jars (i.e. deploys and > displays my first view) but fails with the > corresponding three 20061116 jars. I realize that I > may need more shale jars with the later release as > the work seems to be distributed differently within > the jars, but I was wanting to make the test as > simple as possible (note from above that it also > fails with the full set of 20061116 shale jars). > > Bottom line seems to be that you can get away with > using the latest shale-tiles and tiles-core with an > earlier release of Shale. I never like mixing > releases, but it is working for me - and I want to > test the latest Tiles. > > If anyone has the latest Shale/Tiles working please > post what Shale/Tiles version you are using, and I > will try it. > > Thanks, > > Dick > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $420k for $1,399/mo. Calculate new payment! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre
