I'm very interested! -----Original Message----- From: Alarcón" Vladimir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 novembre 2006 18.00 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: This Shale/Tiles configuration works
Hi, I am interested to discuss new features to a future version of Shale and I would like to know if there is interest on discussing them; if so, please reply. Meanwhile, I am writing down the details. Un abrazo, Vladimir. PS: Sorry for my english :( --- Dick Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been trying to get my Tiles app working with > the current Shale release (thanks Craig and Greg for > your help), and am currently working with the > shale-framework-20061116 jars. My running version > used only the shale-framework-20061004 jars. I have > discovered that I can use the 20061116 shale-tiles > and tiles-core with the 20061004 Shale release, and > have successfully implemented the Tiles 2 FAQ > changes. > > Once I replace my 20061004 shale-xxx jars (except > for the two newer Tiles jars) with the 20061116 jars > my app fails like before with this log data: > > INFO: Undeploying context [/starraShale] > log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger > (org.apache.commons.digester.Digester.sax). > log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system > properly. > Nov 17, 2006 10:14:26 AM > org.apache.tiles.listener.TilesListener > contextInitialized > INFO: Initializing TilesListener > Nov 17, 2006 10:14:26 AM > org.apache.tiles.listener.TilesListener > readFactoryConfig > INFO: CONFIG FILES DEFINED IN WEB.XML > Nov 17, 2006 10:14:26 AM > org.apache.tiles.listener.TilesListener > initDefinitionsFactory > INFO: initializing definitions factory... > SaInitializer.contextInitialized > Nov 17, 2006 10:14:26 AM > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start > SEVERE: Error filterStart > Nov 17, 2006 10:14:26 AM > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start > SEVERE: Context [/starraShale] startup failed due to > previous errors > > My log4j is as follows: > > log4j.debug=true > log4j.appender.C1=org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender > log4j.appender.C1.Threshold=DEBUG > log4j.appender.C1.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout > log4j.appender.C1.layout.ConversionPattern=%d - %p > %c - %m%n > log4j.rootLogger=DEBUG, C1# test > log4j.logger.com.ibatis=DEBUG, C1 > log4j.logger.java.sql=DEBUG, C1 > log4j.logger.org.apache.commons.digester.Digester.sax=DEBUG, > C1 > log4j.logger.org.apache.shale=DEBUG, C1 > log4j.logger.org.apache.catalina.core=DEBUG, C1 > log4j.logger.org.apache.jasper.compiler=DEBUG, C1 > log4j.logger.com.starrcs=TRACE, C1 > > As a test I reduced my shale lib jars to shale-core, > shale-tiles, and tiles-core. This configuration > works with the 20061004 jars (i.e. deploys and > displays my first view) but fails with the > corresponding three 20061116 jars. I realize that I > may need more shale jars with the later release as > the work seems to be distributed differently within > the jars, but I was wanting to make the test as > simple as possible (note from above that it also > fails with the full set of 20061116 shale jars). > > Bottom line seems to be that you can get away with > using the latest shale-tiles and tiles-core with an > earlier release of Shale. I never like mixing > releases, but it is working for me - and I want to > test the latest Tiles. > > If anyone has the latest Shale/Tiles working please > post what Shale/Tiles version you are using, and I > will try it. > > Thanks, > > Dick > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $420k for $1,399/mo. Calculate new payment! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
