Hi, I posted 2 new features for discussion. I am working alone here, here, here...
So, feel free to say if these features are found useful or not. Thanks, Vladimir. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm very interested! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alarcón" Vladimir > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 novembre 2006 18.00 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: This Shale/Tiles configuration works > > Hi, I am interested to discuss new features to a > future version of Shale and I would like to know if > there is interest on discussing them; if so, please > reply. > > Meanwhile, I am writing down the details. > > Un abrazo, > Vladimir. > > PS: Sorry for my english :( > > --- Dick Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have been trying to get my Tiles app working > with > > the current Shale release (thanks Craig and Greg > for > > your help), and am currently working with the > > shale-framework-20061116 jars. My running version > > used only the shale-framework-20061004 jars. I > have > > discovered that I can use the 20061116 shale-tiles > > and tiles-core with the 20061004 Shale release, > and > > have successfully implemented the Tiles 2 FAQ > > changes. > > > > Once I replace my 20061004 shale-xxx jars (except > > for the two newer Tiles jars) with the 20061116 > jars > > my app fails like before with this log data: > > > > INFO: Undeploying context [/starraShale] > > log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger > > (org.apache.commons.digester.Digester.sax). > > log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system > > properly. > > Nov 17, 2006 10:14:26 AM > > org.apache.tiles.listener.TilesListener > > contextInitialized > > INFO: Initializing TilesListener > > Nov 17, 2006 10:14:26 AM > > org.apache.tiles.listener.TilesListener > > readFactoryConfig > > INFO: CONFIG FILES DEFINED IN WEB.XML > > Nov 17, 2006 10:14:26 AM > > org.apache.tiles.listener.TilesListener > > initDefinitionsFactory > > INFO: initializing definitions factory... > > SaInitializer.contextInitialized > > Nov 17, 2006 10:14:26 AM > > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start > > SEVERE: Error filterStart > > Nov 17, 2006 10:14:26 AM > > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start > > SEVERE: Context [/starraShale] startup failed due > to > > previous errors > > > > My log4j is as follows: > > > > log4j.debug=true > > log4j.appender.C1=org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender > > log4j.appender.C1.Threshold=DEBUG > > > log4j.appender.C1.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout > > log4j.appender.C1.layout.ConversionPattern=%d - %p > > %c - %m%n > > log4j.rootLogger=DEBUG, C1# test > > log4j.logger.com.ibatis=DEBUG, C1 > > log4j.logger.java.sql=DEBUG, C1 > > > log4j.logger.org.apache.commons.digester.Digester.sax=DEBUG, > > C1 > > log4j.logger.org.apache.shale=DEBUG, C1 > > log4j.logger.org.apache.catalina.core=DEBUG, C1 > > log4j.logger.org.apache.jasper.compiler=DEBUG, C1 > > log4j.logger.com.starrcs=TRACE, C1 > > > > As a test I reduced my shale lib jars to > shale-core, > > shale-tiles, and tiles-core. This configuration > > works with the 20061004 jars (i.e. deploys and > > displays my first view) but fails with the > > corresponding three 20061116 jars. I realize that > I > > may need more shale jars with the later release as > > the work seems to be distributed differently > within > > the jars, but I was wanting to make the test as > > simple as possible (note from above that it also > > fails with the full set of 20061116 shale jars). > > > > Bottom line seems to be that you can get away with > > using the latest shale-tiles and tiles-core with > an > > earlier release of Shale. I never like mixing > > releases, but it is working for me - and I want to > > test the latest Tiles. > > > > If anyone has the latest Shale/Tiles working > please > > post what Shale/Tiles version you are using, and I > > will try it. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dick > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Sponsored Link > > Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. > $420k for $1,399/mo. Calculate new payment! > www.LowerMyBills.com/lre > > > This message is for the designated recipient only > and may contain privileged, proprietary, or > otherwise private information. If you have received > it in error, please notify the sender immediately > and delete the original. Any other use of the email > by you is prohibited. > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com
