Holy war is a bit dramatic don't you think? 🙂 The difference between Scala
and Python will always be very relevant when choosing between Spark and
Pyspark. I wouldn't call it irrelevant to the original question.

br,

molotch

On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 16:57, "Yuri Oleynikov (‫יורי אולייניקוב‬‎)" <
yur...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It seems that thread converted to holy war that has nothing to do with
> original question. If it is, it’s super disappointing
>
> Отправлено с iPhone
>
> > 17 окт. 2020 г., в 15:53, Molotch <ma...@kth.se> написал(а):
> >
> > I would say the pros and cons of Python vs Scala is both down to Spark,
> the
> > languages in themselves and what kind of data engineer you will get when
> you
> > try to hire for the different solutions.
> >
> > With Pyspark you get less functionality and increased complexity with the
> > py4j java interop compared to vanilla Spark. Why would you want that?
> Maybe
> > you want the Python ML tools and have a clear use case, then go for it.
> If
> > not, avoid the increased complexity and reduced functionality of Pyspark.
> >
> > Python vs Scala? Idiomatic Python is a lesson in bad programming
> > habits/ideas, there's no other way to put it. Do you really want
> programmers
> > enjoying coding i such a language hacking away at your system?
> >
> > Scala might be far from perfect with the plethora of ways to express
> > yourself. But Python < 3.5 is not fit for anything except simple
> scripting
> > IMO.
> >
> > Doing exploratory data analysis in a Jupiter notebook, Pyspark seems
> like a
> > fine idea. Coding an entire ETL library including state management, the
> > whole kitchen including the sink, Scala everyday of the week.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from: http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe e-mail: user-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe e-mail: user-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to