I'm glad someone feels this way. I use JBuilder 8, and I find it's the only IDE that actually has helped me more than it has gotten in my way.
Still, it bothers me that it does things differently than every other IDE out there (Borland Make vs Ant, etc), and I keep threatening to punt it. I'm waiting for the next version before I consider upgrading since it appears real close to coming out based on Borland's "every 6 months" release schedule. That, and I was underwhelmed with JB X. It barely acknowledges the Validator's existence. I know people who used to work at Borland who prefer Intellij IDEA, and I know it has quite the fanatic following, so that should be telling me something... I'd probably like it if I could see it in the hands of someone who knew how to get it to put it's through it's paces, but as it is, I think I'm going to stick with the "devil I know". I never seem to have the time necessary to "change gears" and JB at least integrates cleanly with Tomcat 4.1. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 5:05 AM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: Are there any IDE's that understand Struts tags? > > > JBuilder X (on PC, Mac and Linux) understands Struts. Makes > life a breeze to be honest. I believe this only applies to > the Developer and Enterprise editions, not Personal. > > We've been with JBuilder from version 2 and JBuilder X is by > far the best (quite rightly). > > A free 30 day trial can be download from Borland at www.borland.com. > > Christopher > > PS. I don't work or get commission from Borland ;-). > > ---- Original Message ---- > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "McCormack, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 10:02:42 +0100 > Subject: RE: Are there any IDE's that understand Struts tags? > > I have had problems in the past getting a "web developer" > from a number of design companies that a. understands what > struts/jstl is b. understands how to change html not using DW > with no reworking by a java developer of any tags after the redesign > > In my experience it has been easier to either a. provide a > static screen in Photoshop to the designer for building up in > a gui of their choice. A java dev then needs to insert the > jstl etc in to the page and ensure it still maintains the > design/layout after dynamic elements have been added. b. get > a java dev that has the ability to rework/create the html > inside the jsps to the required design. > > > a. is easier up front but more work in the long run as it > involves a lot more work for the java dev (especially if you > are using tiles). b. is more work at first but works out > better in the long run and has more benefits. > > There has been mention of a struts gui editor on this list > before. You may want to check the history for the threads > with struts+gui or struts+ide in them. I personally use > JDeveloper+Ultraedit32. > > > Chris McCormack > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lipscombe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 May 2004 09:40 > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: Are there any IDE's that understand Struts tags? > > > Folks, > > I am developing a J2EE server using Struts. The JSPs will be > constructed by a web developer who is used to DreamWeaver. > I imported the Struts tag libraries into DW, but the "design > view" doesn't work. He cant layout the pages visually. > Is this a limitation of DW? Are there any web IDE's that > understand Struts tags and allow a design view to be used? > > > TIA Adam > > > > > *********************************************** > This e-mail and its attachments are confidential > and are intended for the above named recipient > only. If this has come to you in error, please notify the > sender immediately and delete this e-mail from your system. > You must take no action based on this, nor must you copy or > disclose it or any part of its contents to any person or > organisation. Statements and opinions contained in this email > may not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods. Please > note that e-mail communications may be monitored. The > registered office of Littlewoods Limited and its subsidiaries > is 100 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L70 1AB. Registered number > of Littlewoods Limited is 262152. > ************************************************ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]