No, Dave, the topic started out to be about Struts and JSF. The two solutions, JSF and Struts, even if Craig got JSF into the Struts camp with Shale, are competely antithetical. Read the MASTER HISSELF, Rod Johnson, in J2EE Development without EJB on Struts and JSF, Shale, or whatever. I have nothing against the development of JSF and other tool based solutions for the coding challenged. However, it is not Struts and doing them together is nutso. JSF is not, in my opinion, going to the be the future. It is so old at this point that it must soon be considered to be the past?
Jack On Apr 1, 2005 11:30 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erik Weber wrote: > > > I agree. I thought, Craig, that you until recently were interested in > > Struts and JSF coexisting, meaning that both would grow, even if you > > were no longer the active leader of Struts. > > I don't think anybody said anything about not using Struts; we were > discussing the Struts tags, HTML in particular. > > Why is everybody opposed to JSF? I don't know a whole lot about it and > am at a point where I need to think about future development needs. > > Dave > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
