<SNIP> On Apr 1, 2005 2:37 PM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dakota Jack wrote: > > That does not mean it is horrible, of course, but it is about as new > > as "Lost in Space" is new on TV. Remember that robot that always went > > "Crisis! Crisis!"? LOL > > It was "Danger! Danger!", which applies just about as well :) </SNIP>
Oh, yes! Danger! Danger! I loved that little gay robot. <SNIP> > > Anyway, I think a lot of the hype and a lot of the reason why JSF > > oddly is presented from a Struts arena is that it just is not picking > > up ateam at all and looks like a lost enterprise. > > I think that's a dangerous statement to make, even though my own > experience would corroborate it. I've heard a lot of negativity at > recent Java user group meetings about JSF, but at the same time I've > heard some positive statement too. Judging whether it is or isn't > picking up steam is probably a very tought thing to do right now. </SNIP> Any steam would be picking up steam. This is not a new technology. This is old as the hills. It has only recently become a brother to Struts and Struts really is the source of hype. All those tool companies that were there at the beginning, as Craig noted, have not made the grade. And, those developers that have indicated an interest and an involvement, save for our own Martin Cooper, are not really what you would call the creme d' l' creme of this side of the world. I don't think this is a dangerous statement at all. I would stake my bad reputation on it. ///;-) Jack -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
