well... maybe you are a totally cool development team, maybe I'm completely wrong either... I just had the feeling that making code reviews, following call stacks, debugging... distribution and so on would be a real mess... but, as I told before, I never tried myself. But what are the benefits for you to use ror?
leon On 2/20/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leon Rosenberg wrote: > > On 2/20/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Leon Rosenberg wrote: > >> > >>> Well RoR is a wonderful thing if you are playing. But you can't > >>> develop and you have no chance to maintain a serious application with it. > >>> > >> I'm having zero issues maintaining several, although they are not > >> high-load apps yet. > > how many developers are/were working on each? > > > Most of them are a three-person team but we have one that has a Small > Wad (about a dozen total) working in fits and starts as the mood strikes > them, under Subversion. > > I'm far more concerned about scalability than anything else; we've had > essentially zero issues related to team size. One of the apps is going > to be converted into a Spring/J2EE stack for sure; wait-and-see on the rest. > > I guess I don't see what the big deal is, but we are a fairly > disciplined group of developers, several of us with large-scale Lisp > experience, which might help, I dunno. > > Dave > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
