I could not bear the thought of having some of these committers talk about my code when they have trouble with the English language, much less Java.
On 3/24/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Michael Jouravlev wrote: > > On 3/24/06, Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>I have an idea. Why don't we publish the source code to Struts so that > >>absolutely anyone can contribute to the project. You are right that > >>we'll need a review process for all those contributions. So why don't we > >>require all incoming code to be reviewed by at least one experienced > >>developer before it is added to the code base. After a while, developers > >>will earn a level of trust and we can relax the review requirement to > >>only happen after the code is updated. > >> > >>Thanks for the advice. We should implement this new process right away. > >> > >>Steve > > > > > > Does not it work like this already? Someone opens up a Bugzilla ticket > > and puts up code. Then a committer verifies it and commits it. Well, > > if there is a committer who finds the code at all worthy ;-) > > Or that there is a committer who actually looks at it... :-) > > Jonathan Revusky > -- > lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/ > FreeMarker group blog, http://freemarker.blogspot.com/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
