Steve Raeburn wrote:
I normally ignore your crap and I'm sorry for prolonging this agony for
everyone. This really will be my last word.
Michael, why do you continue to waste your time on such a "big pile of
crap" as Struts? What kind of a fool must you be for using the world's
worst web framework, run by a bunch on idiotic dictators?
Steve, do you realize that a lot of rank-and-file people out there don't
have a choice about what tools they use in their daily paid work? For
example, Patrick Lightbody, currently lead developer of the Webwork
project, was using Struts in his day job for a good while. I recall this
from looking at this blog. When he wrote this "Struts Really Sucks" blog
entry,
http://blogs.opensymphony.com/plightbo/2003/10/webwork_docaday_struts_really.html
he knew whereof he spoke. He had quite intimate knowledge of Struts from
having to use it at work.
If he'd had the choice in that day job, he surely would have been using
Webwork.
I remember at one point lurking on the Tapestry list a bit (a few years
back) and Howard Lewis Ship (Mr. Tapestry himself) mentioned that he was
using Struts in his day-job and finding it quite frustrating.
If Howard had had the choice, he surely would have used Tapestry.
Anyway, you really ought to answer the question I posed earlier. Why, in
your opinion, did Struts development stagnate? Surely you have thought
about this....
Regards,
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
> If you really
> believe that, then you are as big a loser as you appear to be. If you
> think you can do better, then fine, go do it. But please, quit whining
> and doing nothing about it. Or do you just enjoy whining?
Please. Get a life.
Steve
p.s. Don't bother addressing any reply to me. You'll just be pissing in
the wind.
Dakota Jack wrote:
The fact is that there will not be an explanation for this failure.
While
sitting in the biggest pile of crap code one could imagine, they
continue to
extoll their virtues as if they were about to be mentioned for an
honorarium
in computer history.
<snip>
On 3/24/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steve Raeburn wrote:
Bottom line is that this is the way Apache works and it's not going to
change.
In any case, it is not a subject of legitimate debate at this point that
progress on the Struts framework stagnated. If you guys were doing
everything right, then what is your explanation for that?
Jonathan Revusky
</snip>
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
