It's possible that the use case of a an empty action extension was not considered when the filter was first designed. It does seem like a valid use case, and it may be time to patch the filter.
-Ted. On 7/26/07, matihost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wondering why filter dispatcher do not check existence of mapping returned > from ActionMapper and if it doesn't exist, behave as when ActionMapper is > null. Probably it is faster for not empty "struts.action.extension" actions. > > I found also solution to use /someName/* for struts filter dispatcher > mapping, but i don`t want to use it. > > -- > Greetings > Mateusz Nowakowski --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
