I have to agree. Our touch with the JSF Oracle was both painful and fruitless and lead us to truly appreciate how bad things could be.
Having said that, I think Martin has raised some points about how S2 can be improved and I think S2 is at a stage where there needs to be some general discussion on where all interested parties (devs and users) think the framework should be heading and where there are deficiencies. I for one think, that with S2¹s improved plugin architecture, there is a huge amount of scope in what can be achieved. We need a few key people to guide the process. I know my biggest fear is over committing and not having the time to deliver. If there was a centralised coordinator who could organise a second tier of developers, for example, who can help on a smaller scale then I believe more of the niche development could be achieved. Z. > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Andrey Rogov<strut...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I agree with Matt Rable that JSF programming based on RAD methods makes us >> > transition to JSF. > > I think many, many people have crossed that bridge and came back in > rush after a while. > > musachy
