Martin Gainty wrote:
mg>at least your attack took more than 5 seconds of thought
mg>whos next?????
Me.
We're not "attacking" you at random--we just don't think you make a lot
of sense a lot of the time and often add more confusion than value.
When you obfuscate issues under what's often essentially random (to us)
source code it's really important to let the original poster *know* that
it's completely unrelated to the question. It's not that we don't *want*
you to contribute, we just want the contributions to be meaningful,
accurate, helpful, etc. I mean, come on: you've posted XW 1.x code,
Spring MVC code, told people there's a bug because some code didn't
exist (when clearly it *must*)... there are a *lot* of examples.
We've tried the polite route: we've asked you repeatedly to clarify why
you've posted what you did or explain its relevance to the thread. The
vast majority of the time we get no response. That's why people started
joking about you being a bot.
I'm *imploring* you to be more careful when responding to people's
questions. Be a force of good, not confusion.
Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
