this has been a long time coming. Martin: I also appreciate your efforts as you try to answer questions but as dave said..most of the time they make the poster more confused.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Dave Newton <newton.d...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Martin Gainty wrote: > >> mg>at least your attack took more than 5 seconds of thought >> mg>whos next????? >> > > Me. > > We're not "attacking" you at random--we just don't think you make a lot of > sense a lot of the time and often add more confusion than value. > > When you obfuscate issues under what's often essentially random (to us) > source code it's really important to let the original poster *know* that > it's completely unrelated to the question. It's not that we don't *want* you > to contribute, we just want the contributions to be meaningful, accurate, > helpful, etc. I mean, come on: you've posted XW 1.x code, Spring MVC code, > told people there's a bug because some code didn't exist (when clearly it > *must*)... there are a *lot* of examples. > > We've tried the polite route: we've asked you repeatedly to clarify why > you've posted what you did or explain its relevance to the thread. The vast > majority of the time we get no response. That's why people started joking > about you being a bot. > > I'm *imploring* you to be more careful when responding to people's > questions. Be a force of good, not confusion. > > Dave > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >
