I wonder if we could also consider a mod to option 4 where only the dragon and the word trafodion are present. See the two images attached.
I sampled a couple apache project logs and found they do not have the word APACHE in their logos (e.g., HIVE, MONGODB, AVRO, SPARK). With this approach, it is possible to put the Trafodion logo into the "power by Apache" logo, see URL here <http://www.apache.org/foundation/press/kit/>, without the duplication of "Apache". It also simplifies the design and allows a good focus. Thanks --Qifan On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Rohit <[email protected]> wrote: > -1 > > Check out the other logos I sent to the internal dlist. > > Rohit > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Gunnar Tapper <[email protected]> > Date: 02/12/2016 12:50 AM (GMT-06:00) > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Logo Proposal > > Hi, > > I suggest that we limit the number of colors used. > > A simple change: > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxlwNhWxn8iTT3NNMTZ0dmhqQm8 > > Thanks, > > Gunnar > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Trina Krug <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Option 4!! >> >> Trina >> >> On Feb 11, 2016, at 7:05 PM, Carol Pearson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Slightly late to the party, but +1 on option 4 as well. Though I would >> prefer a slightly less formal font, the one in option 6 is too spaced out >> and I'm not fond of it overall... >> >> But that's really a nit and this is infinitely better than no logo at >> all.... >> >> Thanks Ken! >> >> -Carol P. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> Email: [email protected] >> Twitter: @CarolP222 >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Gunnar Tapper <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Neither. Keep the font the same for Apache and Trafodion. Bold them both. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sandhya Sundaresan < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Perhaps we should try and see how lowercase with both placements look. >>>> The dragon on top looks better to many. We can take votes again J >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Wei-Shiun Tsai [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:13 PM >>>> >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> +1 for Dave’s and Hans’ suggestion. Like the dragon to sit on the >>>> right, not on top of Trafodion. But the font in #4 looks more professional >>>> (perhaps also in lower case). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Weishiun >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Dave Birdsall [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:04 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I like the font for option 4 (perhaps lower cased as Hans mentioned), >>>> but with the placement of option 6. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> That said, either one is fine. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Eric Owhadi [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:02 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> +1 option 4 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Anuradha Hegde [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 4:57 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> +1 option 4 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Ken Holt [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 2:51 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Seems like the dragon logo itself is a winner - most everyone liked >>>> that. >>>> >>>> But the combined logo and name was definitely not popular. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Here are a couple of new suggestions for the combined logo and name. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Option 4 >>>> >>>> >>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4T3o3YVBDakNtQkU/view?usp=sharing >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Option 6 >>>> >>>> >>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4Y082OHhNNXBwazA/view?usp=sharing >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Don't ask for options 1-3, & 5 - they didn't make it passed my limited >>>> field testing! >>>> >>>> Comments on 4 & 6? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, Ken >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Sandhya Sundaresan < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I’d say there is enough “curliness” going on with the dragon. So we >>>> could try with a simple bold font . Perhaps with an outline of a different >>>> color like Hadoop’s/Mahouts is and tie it in with the dragon’s colors as >>>> well. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Hans Zeller [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 3:46 PM >>>> >>>> >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> +1 for the dragon as well. We used to have an informal logo with >>>> another somewhat cursive font, it shows in one of the carousel pictures on >>>> the trafodion.apache.org site. That might be better (although still >>>> not my favorite). >>>> >>>> >>>> Hans >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Ken Holt <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> By the way, the size of the example logo is arbitrary. The original is >>>> a vector graphics file that will scale up or down with no loss of quality, >>>> which I will make available when the debate has settled on something. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'll make a stab at changing the font and size relative to the dragon >>>> and post another version of that. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Agree that separating the dragon from the name/font makes sense. >>>> >>>> Cheers, Ken >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 on dragon. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Carol Pearson < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 on the Dragon!!! Looks great! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On the writing, cursive is hard to read, so I'm up for replacing it >>>> separately. Maybe we vote on each separately (as Sandhya and Amanda did)? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Voting separately is a good idea. Having engineers vote on 'designs' is >>>> always a tough one. Sounds like folks like the dragon but not the >>>> cursive... so suggest splitting out what we vote on so at least the dragon >>>> carries. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> St.Ack >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Carol P. >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Email: [email protected] >>>> >>>> Twitter: @CarolP222 >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Sandhya Sundaresan < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 for Dragon. >>>> >>>> The Trafodion cursive writing and color -1. IMHO we need to rework the >>>> writing for sure and try various colors. It’s looking cluttered and >>>> complicated with the cursive. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Amanda Moran [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 10:13 AM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> +10 for dragon! Very cute! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Not a huge fan of the cursive writing myself... but if everyone else >>>> likes... I give it a +0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Christophe LeRouzo <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks Ken, the standalone dragon looks really good. It complements >>>> really well the yellow elephant! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> -clr >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Dave Birdsall [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 9:53 AM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I like both. I do agree that the font for “Trafodion” makes a’s and o’s >>>> too much alike. Would be nice to switch to another font that doesn’t have >>>> that issue. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Ken Holt [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 9:48 AM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Logo Proposal >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Apache Trafodion needs a logo. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I believe there was some discussion about a logo for Trafodion quite >>>> some time ago, but we never really resolved it. In the very early days of >>>> Trafodion, before becoming an Apache project (incubating) I devised a logo >>>> that leveraged the Welsh connection of the project name, and that was a >>>> simple cute dragon. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I now have a much improved version of that original logo and propose >>>> that we use this as the official Trafodion logo going forward. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Dragon standalone - >>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4QmttYnBzZDdFSTQ/view?usp=sharing >>>> >>>> Trafodion name & dragon - >>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4Y3RRdVQwb0owSFU/view?usp=sharing >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I’m not thrilled with the font choice for “Trafodion” – the o’s and a’s >>>> look too similar. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thoughts? Should we vote on this? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, Ken >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Amanda Moran >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Gunnar >>> *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.* >>> >> >> > > > -- > Thanks, > > Gunnar > *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.* > -- Regards, --Qifan
