SCA provisions added security and transaction services to deployed components while the other methods don't
the other that I can point at might not seem to be an added value but components in BPEL have logical relationship, like how steps in a process relate to, but in SCA its more like component relation within an architecture ________________________________ From: Mukhtiar Memon <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, February 8, 2009 11:52:40 AM Subject: Challenging SCA with other models ... Hi all, To my understanding"SCA is a deployment-time composition of services, from language- and platform- independent omponents" I have a very basic query about the SCA, when we campare SCA with other models. When we compare SCA with existing application composition models i.e. Component-based model and BPEL. I don't find anything special in SCA model. Could anyone please tell me what SCA has in particular that these model don't or can't have. If there is nothing that SCA has in particular then why should one use SCA model. In short, I want to know Distinctions of SCA model not Similarities. Thanks Mukhtiar ________________________________ Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
