On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2009, at 11:41 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Martin Meyers <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear Luciano:
>
> First of all, thank you for the first hints. Please, feel free to read my
> comments/questions inline:
>
> 1. Is it actually possible to use other BPEL engines than "Apache ODE" in
> SCA-BPEL component implementations?
>
> Although currently we only support Apache ODE as a BPEL engine, we can
>
> easily extend Tuscany to support other BPEL engines, as long as it's
>
> compatible with Apache license.
>
> Which non-commercial BPEL engines would be the ones that definitely are
> compatible with the Apache license?
>
> I guess that this does not hold 100% for "ActiveBPEL", right?
>
>
> The issue here is compatibility with Apache License... engines
> licensed as GPL or LGPL would not be compatible.
>
> JBPM would be ok. But, to make sure we are on the same page, we will
> need to build a impplementation-bpel-jbpm module that would handle the
> JBPM specific behaviour, and not just remove ODE and plug JBPM.
>
> Software that is distributed by the Apache Tuscany project (or any ASF
> project) can only include software that is compatible with the ASF's
> software license policy. If anyone's interested in the details, here's more
> info -- http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
> Since ActiveBPEL is GPL, the Tuscany project could not include ActiveBPEL in
> a Tuscany distribution. However, this does not necessarily prevent someone
> from using ActiveBPEL within Tuscany. For instance, an
> implementation-bpel-activebpel module could be developed outside of the
> Tuscany project.

If that would be the case, I'd suggest using

http://code.google.com/p/tuscany-extensions/


> Also, there are options for allowing prohibitively licensed software to work
> with an apache product -- http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#options .
> I'm not saying that this can be accomplished for ActiveBPEL. Just want to be
> sure we're thinking about this properly..
> --kevan
>



-- 
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to