On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Martin Meyers <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Luciano: > >> > Which non-commercial BPEL engines would be the ones that definitely are >> > compatible with the Apache license? >> > I guess that this does not hold 100% for "ActiveBPEL", right? >> >> The issue here is compatibility with Apache License... engines >> licensed as GPL or LGPL would not be compatible. > > Ah, O.K. > >> JBPM would be ok. But, to make sure we are on the same page, we will >> need to build a impplementation-bpel-jbpm module that would handle the >> JBPM specific behaviour, and not just remove ODE and plug JBPM. > > Concerning the mentioned "implementation-bpel-jbpm module" (and as I am still > a newbie to Tuscany/ODE): > (a) Would such an implementation take a long time? and > (b) Would it be envisioned for these coming days? >
This really depends on the level of understanding you have with JBPM internals to create the extension, I'd certainly be able to help on the Tuscany/SCA side. > Please, tell me something more about the upcoming plan(s), if possible. The > reason is that I have to start with the prototyping as soon as possible. > > Thanks a lot, again! > > Best regards, > Martin > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > Psssst! Schon vom neuen WEB.DE MultiMessenger gehört? > Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.produkte.web.de/messenger/?did=3123 > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
