On 15/01/14 20:51, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
On 15.01.2014, at 15:10, Jens Grivolla <[email protected]> wrote:
The CFP itself must still be rewritten to be less UIMA-centric, other than that
this is starting to look quite good.
GATE developer Mark A. Greenwood did the rewrite and sent me a pull
request on Github.
For example, the topic "experience reports combining UIMA-based components from
different sources, as well as solutions to interoperability issues" could be
reworded as:
1) experience reports combining language analysis components from different
sources, as well as solutions to interoperability issues
2) experience reports combining different frameworks (e.g.
GATE/UIMA/WebLicht/etc.), as well as solutions to interoperability issues
I put both in there as separate points.
I think both aspects would be interesting. I'm a little afraid that 1) might
end up iterating the existing of frameworks like UIMA, while 2) would end up
referring over web-services or semantic web stuff for interoperability - which
may not be very interesting. I'd be more interested in issues and solutions
exist beyond this, e.g. with regards to the interchangability of components.
What problems exist when e.g. one parser component in a workflow is replaced
with a different one? How can these be solved? (Cf. Noh and Padó, 2013 [1]).
Agree. Subtle semantic differences between alternative components can
be more challenging than the technical integration. I'm not sure how to
put that in the CFP without it getting very verbose, though.
I think one more topic could be added:
- "combining annotation type systems in processing frameworks (GATE, UIMA, etc.)
with standardization efforts, such as done in the ISO TC37/SC4 or TEI contexts."
Done. Thanks for your input.
As always, the current state of the proposal can be seen on Github:
https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/proposal.md
I think the current version is pretty close to final. If there are any
more suggestions hurry up, the deadline is approaching.
-- Jens
