On 3/26/2014 9:44 AM, Jens Grivolla wrote: > Hi all, I have just posted the (more or less) final CFP on uima-user and > uima-dev. > > Feel free to distribute the CFP to anybody you think would be interested. > While this has been merged with a different workshop and thus has a somewhat > wider scope than just UIMA, I still view this as a followup to the the UIMA > workshop at GSCL and would hope to have similarly interesting contributions > from the UIMA community. > > If you are a PC member, or willing to be one, please contact me off-list with > the email address and affiliation that you would like me to use for this > purpose. > > Finally, despite the fact that UIMA does not appear in the title anymore, > would it be possible to have an announcement on the UIMA web page?
I think so (unless others disagree). Can you draft something? -Marshall > > -- Jens > > On 05/02/14 11:46, Jens Grivolla wrote: >> We have been asked to merge our workshop with a similar one focusing on >> "open infrastructures". The result is a "Workshop on Open >> Infrastructures and Analysis Frameworks for HLT". >> >> We will now start to build a common CFP from the two proposals. All >> contributions are welcome: >> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/cfp.md >> >> >> >> -- Jens >> >> On 19/01/14 15:40, Jens Grivolla wrote: >>> I have sent the proposal, we'll see what they say... >>> >>> -- Jens >>> >>> On 17/01/14 15:02, Jens Grivolla wrote: >>>> On 15/01/14 20:51, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: >>>>> On 15.01.2014, at 15:10, Jens Grivolla >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> The CFP itself must still be rewritten to be less UIMA-centric, other >>>>>> than that this is starting to look quite good. >>>> >>>> GATE developer Mark A. Greenwood did the rewrite and sent me a pull >>>> request on Github. >>>> >>>>> For example, the topic "experience reports combining UIMA-based >>>>> components from different sources, as well as solutions to >>>>> interoperability issues" could be reworded as: >>>>> >>>>> 1) experience reports combining language analysis components from >>>>> different sources, as well as solutions to interoperability issues >>>>> >>>>> 2) experience reports combining different frameworks (e.g. >>>>> GATE/UIMA/WebLicht/etc.), as well as solutions to interoperability >>>>> issues >>>> >>>> I put both in there as separate points. >>>> >>>>> I think both aspects would be interesting. I'm a little afraid that 1) >>>>> might end up iterating the existing of frameworks like UIMA, while 2) >>>>> would end up referring over web-services or semantic web stuff for >>>>> interoperability - which may not be very interesting. I'd be more >>>>> interested in issues and solutions exist beyond this, e.g. with >>>>> regards to the interchangability of components. What problems exist >>>>> when e.g. one parser component in a workflow is replaced with a >>>>> different one? How can these be solved? (Cf. Noh and Padó, 2013 [1]). >>>> >>>> Agree. Subtle semantic differences between alternative components can >>>> be more challenging than the technical integration. I'm not sure how to >>>> put that in the CFP without it getting very verbose, though. >>>> >>>>> I think one more topic could be added: >>>>> >>>>> - "combining annotation type systems in processing frameworks (GATE, >>>>> UIMA, etc.) with standardization efforts, such as done in the ISO >>>>> TC37/SC4 or TEI contexts." >>>> >>>> Done. Thanks for your input. >>>> >>>> As always, the current state of the proposal can be seen on Github: >>>> https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/proposal.md >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I think the current version is pretty close to final. If there are any >>>> more suggestions hurry up, the deadline is approaching. >>>> >>>> -- Jens >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > >
