svn is sick - see http://status.apache.org/
it's been sick a while: scroll down a bit on that page and see the svn commit activity drop to 0 about maybe 16 hours ago. -Marshall On 12/3/2014 9:57 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > The svn commit failed. I gonna try it again later. > > Am 03.12.2014 15:45, schrieb Peter Klügl: >> Am 03.12.2014 15:00, schrieb Peter Klügl: >>> Unfortunately, the builder overrides the extensions with the provided >>> ones in the workbench. >>> >>> I can change this if you want. However, it would also be reasonable to >>> investigate why the extension is not added anyway... >> Was just a minimal change. If you work on the current trunk, you can >> give it a try. >> >> Best, >> >> Peter >> >> >>> Best, >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> Am 02.12.2014 16:57, schrieb Peter Klügl: >>>> Hmmm, I have to check it (tomorrow) ... >>>> >>>> Am 02.12.2014 16:53, schrieb Silvestre Losada: >>>>> I have it in descriptor folder however ruta workbench is not using that >>>>> file. would it be possible that ruta workbench has another one? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> On 2 December 2014 at 16:24, Peter Klügl <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> should be in the descriptor folder of the ruta project >>>>>> >>>>>> Peter >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 02.12.2014 16:03, schrieb Silvestre Losada: >>>>>>> Hi Peter, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Could you tell me where is located BasicEngine.xml templated? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2 December 2014 at 13:42, Peter Klügl <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> there are two types of extension, one for the analysis engine and one >>>>>>>> for the workbench. >>>>>>>> The second takes care that the descriptor contain references to the >>>>>>>> first one. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Provides the editor syntax highlighting for your new action? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you have a plugin in the workbench that provides an Eclipse >>>>>>>> extension >>>>>>>> for the extension point org.apache.uima.ruta.ide.actionExtension? >>>>>>>> I wonder why the extension is part of the classpath at all if the >>>>>>>> configuration parameters are not updated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The descriptors are replaced when the script file is saved. There is no >>>>>>>> direct way to avoid the overwriting. If you do not want to take care of >>>>>>>> the Workbench stuff at all, you could probably also just add the >>>>>>>> extension to the BasicEngine.xml (it's the template for the >>>>>>>> descriptors) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 02.12.2014 13:15, schrieb Silvestre Losada: >>>>>>>>> I created new UIMA action using the languages extension >>>>>>>>> < >>>>>> https://uima.apache.org/d/ruta-current/tools.ruta.book.html#ugr.tools.ruta.language.extensions >>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>> In file descriptor generated by ruta workbench I had to added to >>>>>>>>> configuration parameters in additiionalExtensions section. The >>>>>> extension >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>> working properly, however ruta workbench overwrites the file >>>>>>>>> descriptor >>>>>>>>> sometimes and I loose that configuration. Is there any way to >>>>>> configure >>>>>>>>> Ruta workbench to avoid overwriting the file descriptor? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kind regards >>>>>>>>> > >
