I've committed the changes now. Peter
Am 03.12.2014 21:29, schrieb Silvestre Losada: > Thanks for it. > > I'll try tomorrow. > > > Best > > El Wed Dec 03 2014 at 15:58:43, Peter Klügl (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > >> The svn commit failed. I gonna try it again later. >> >> Am 03.12.2014 15:45, schrieb Peter Klügl: >>> Am 03.12.2014 15:00, schrieb Peter Klügl: >>>> Unfortunately, the builder overrides the extensions with the provided >>>> ones in the workbench. >>>> >>>> I can change this if you want. However, it would also be reasonable to >>>> investigate why the extension is not added anyway... >>> Was just a minimal change. If you work on the current trunk, you can >>> give it a try. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> Am 02.12.2014 16:57, schrieb Peter Klügl: >>>>> Hmmm, I have to check it (tomorrow) ... >>>>> >>>>> Am 02.12.2014 16:53, schrieb Silvestre Losada: >>>>>> I have it in descriptor folder however ruta workbench is not using >> that >>>>>> file. would it be possible that ruta workbench has another one? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2 December 2014 at 16:24, Peter Klügl <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>>> should be in the descriptor folder of the ruta project >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 02.12.2014 16:03, schrieb Silvestre Losada: >>>>>>>> Hi Peter, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could you tell me where is located BasicEngine.xml templated? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2 December 2014 at 13:42, Peter Klügl <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> there are two types of extension, one for the analysis engine and >> one >>>>>>>>> for the workbench. >>>>>>>>> The second takes care that the descriptor contain references to the >>>>>>>>> first one. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Provides the editor syntax highlighting for your new action? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do you have a plugin in the workbench that provides an Eclipse >> extension >>>>>>>>> for the extension point org.apache.uima.ruta.ide.actionExtension? >>>>>>>>> I wonder why the extension is part of the classpath at all if the >>>>>>>>> configuration parameters are not updated. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The descriptors are replaced when the script file is saved. There >> is no >>>>>>>>> direct way to avoid the overwriting. If you do not want to take >> care of >>>>>>>>> the Workbench stuff at all, you could probably also just add the >>>>>>>>> extension to the BasicEngine.xml (it's the template for the >> descriptors) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am 02.12.2014 13:15, schrieb Silvestre Losada: >>>>>>>>>> I created new UIMA action using the languages extension >>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>> https://uima.apache.org/d/ruta-current/tools.ruta.book. >> html#ugr.tools.ruta.language.extensions >>>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>>> In file descriptor generated by ruta workbench I had to added to >>>>>>>>>> configuration parameters in additiionalExtensions section. The >>>>>>> extension >>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>> working properly, however ruta workbench overwrites the file >> descriptor >>>>>>>>>> sometimes and I loose that configuration. Is there any way to >>>>>>> configure >>>>>>>>>> Ruta workbench to avoid overwriting the file descriptor? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Kind regards >>>>>>>>>> >>
