----- [email protected] wrote: > On 06/28/12 12:42, Craig Mohrman wrote: > > ----- [email protected] wrote: > > > >>> What I really need reviewed is the IPS legacy entries. > >>> Do they stay or go? > >> At the current time, they should be left as-is. > > So check if I understand this correctly. > > > > 7117296 legacy actions need some love > > > > removed the SUNWgawk legacy reference from my manifest. > > I believe this is correct because SUNWgawk never shipped > > in S10? > > $ ls /ws/sfw10-gate/usr/src/cmd/gawk > > /ws/sfw10-gate/usr/src/cmd/gawk: No such file or directory > > > > And didn't appear in OpenSolaris until AFTER we had switched > > to IPS packaging? build 133 > > > > $ sccs prt > /ws/sfwnv-gate/deleted_files/usr/src/cmd/gawk/Makefile.sfw > > > > /ws/sfwnv-gate/deleted_files/usr/src/cmd/gawk/SCCS/s.Makefile.sfw: > > > > D 1.1 08/10/01 13:48:05 cf46844 1 0 00074/00000/00000 > > PSARC/2008/594 Include GNU awk 3.1.5 > > 6736964 add gawk open source package to sfw consolidation > > > > onnv_146 08/02/2010 08/09/2010 > > you should check the integrated status of the bug. it wasn't 146. > though whether it matters that somebody might have depended on > SUNWgawk > between 101 > and 133? doubt it. >
Uh. Right. Oct 2008. onnv_101 10/13/2008 10/20/2008 Limited Content Build for opensolaris2008.11 Thanks Mike. Now I'm really confused. gawk did ship in OpenSolaris. So don't legacy actions stay to handle OpenSolaris? > > > > > So the legacy removal is correct. > > I'm I understanding correctly? > > > > craig > > _______________________________________________ > > userland-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss _______________________________________________ userland-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss
