I think it might be because of this flow control message that I see between
brokers. Here pprfdaa300 is another broker. But why would this happen
between brokers though?

2013-01-03 14:44:21,587 | INFO  |
Usage(default:memory:queue://eventsEndpoint:memory) percentUsage=0%,
usage=0, limit=20971520,
percentUsageMinDelta=1%;Parent:Usage(default:memory) percentUsage=106%,
usage=22325599, limit=20971520, percentUsageMinDelta=1%: Usage Manager
Memory Limit reached. Producer
(ID:pprfdaa300.ind.net-51311-1351809358414-145227:1:1:1) stopped to prevent
flooding queue://eventsEndpoint. See
http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html for more info
(blocking for: 6822s) | org.apache.activemq.broker.region.Queue | ActiveMQ
Transport: tcp://pprfdaa300.ind.net/10.145.67.135:61616@41478

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Christian Posta
<christian.po...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Can you post the config for the two brokers?
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanch...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > It's A <----> B
> >
> > Broker A has 2 messages but no consumers
> > Broker B has consumers but don't get messages forwarded
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Christian Posta
> > <christian.po...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> > > Can you explain how the brokers are set up? A ---> B ? and which has
> the
> > > messages and which has the consumer?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanch...@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > As I understand that if I have network of brokers than the messages
> > will
> > > be
> > > > sent to the broker that has active consumers on it. I have 2 network
> of
> > > > brokers and one of them has 2 messages and no client consumers and
> > other
> > > > one has consumers. I was expecting those 2 messages to be pulled by
> > other
> > > > broker for processing. Could you please help me understand why those
> 2
> > > > messages wouldn't get processed?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Christian Posta*
> > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > twitter: @christianposta
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Christian Posta*
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> twitter: @christianposta
>

Reply via email to