DispatchAsync controls how the broker delivers messages to the bridge's network (proxy) consumer.
please post the broker configs you're using as well as the destination/subscriptions stats (inflight, dispatchcount, enqueue, dequeue, etc)? On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanch...@gmail.com>wrote: > Is it better to set dispathAsync=false on the network of brokers? Currently > it looks like this? > > Name< > http://pprfdaamq300.ie.intuit.net:8161/admin/connections.jsp;jsessionid=ndx7f1ktjogh158jxtqfmr79t# > > > Network TTL< > http://pprfdaamq300.ie.intuit.net:8161/admin/connections.jsp;jsessionid=ndx7f1ktjogh158jxtqfmr79t# > > > Dynamic Only< > http://pprfdaamq300.ie.intuit.net:8161/admin/connections.jsp;jsessionid=ndx7f1ktjogh158jxtqfmr79t# > > > Conduit Subscriptions< > http://pprfdaamq300.ie.intuit.net:8161/admin/connections.jsp;jsessionid=ndx7f1ktjogh158jxtqfmr79t# > > > Bridge Temps< > http://pprfdaamq300.ie.intuit.net:8161/admin/connections.jsp;jsessionid=ndx7f1ktjogh158jxtqfmr79t# > > > Decrease Priorities< > http://pprfdaamq300.ie.intuit.net:8161/admin/connections.jsp;jsessionid=ndx7f1ktjogh158jxtqfmr79t# > > > Dispatch Async< > http://pprfdaamq300.ie.intuit.net:8161/admin/connections.jsp;jsessionid=ndx7f1ktjogh158jxtqfmr79t# > > > NC 1 false true true false true > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:26 AM, James Green <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > We have observed this when the link between A & B is slow. Probably a > > different scenario to the one Mohit is describing though. > > > > In our case we had a hub behind a shared ADSL link and several spokes in > > "production land". We would see messages piling up at random on the > spokes > > until restarts where issued of the brokers. In the end, out of ideas, we > > shifted the hub to be in the same network at the spokes and messages > began > > flowing far more reliably. > > > > James > > > > > > On 4 January 2013 15:10, Christian Posta <christian.po...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > PFC can still affect the network bridge. We should figure out why > > messages > > > are piling up (unexpectedly??). Do you have a test case that can > > reproduce > > > this? > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanch...@gmail.com > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > I think it might be because of this flow control message that I see > > > between > > > > brokers. Here pprfdaa300 is another broker. But why would this happen > > > > between brokers though? > > > > > > > > 2013-01-03 14:44:21,587 | INFO | > > > > Usage(default:memory:queue://eventsEndpoint:memory) percentUsage=0%, > > > > usage=0, limit=20971520, > > > > percentUsageMinDelta=1%;Parent:Usage(default:memory) > percentUsage=106%, > > > > usage=22325599, limit=20971520, percentUsageMinDelta=1%: Usage > Manager > > > > Memory Limit reached. Producer > > > > (ID:pprfdaa300.ind.net-51311-1351809358414-145227:1:1:1) stopped to > > > prevent > > > > flooding queue://eventsEndpoint. See > > > > http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html for more info > > > > (blocking for: 6822s) | org.apache.activemq.broker.region.Queue | > > > ActiveMQ > > > > Transport: tcp://pprfdaa300.ind.net/10.145.67.135:61616@41478 > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Christian Posta > > > > <christian.po...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Can you post the config for the two brokers? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Mohit Anchlia < > > mohitanch...@gmail.com > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > It's A <----> B > > > > > > > > > > > > Broker A has 2 messages but no consumers > > > > > > Broker B has consumers but don't get messages forwarded > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Christian Posta > > > > > > <christian.po...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you explain how the brokers are set up? A ---> B ? and > which > > > has > > > > > the > > > > > > > messages and which has the consumer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Mohit Anchlia < > > > > mohitanch...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I understand that if I have network of brokers than the > > > messages > > > > > > will > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > sent to the broker that has active consumers on it. I have 2 > > > > network > > > > > of > > > > > > > > brokers and one of them has 2 messages and no client > consumers > > > and > > > > > > other > > > > > > > > one has consumers. I was expecting those 2 messages to be > > pulled > > > by > > > > > > other > > > > > > > > broker for processing. Could you please help me understand > why > > > > those > > > > > 2 > > > > > > > > messages wouldn't get processed? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > *Christian Posta* > > > > > > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog > > > > > > > twitter: @christianposta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > *Christian Posta* > > > > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog > > > > > twitter: @christianposta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > *Christian Posta* > > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog > > > twitter: @christianposta > > > > > > -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta
