I restarted activemq so everything was reset and currently all of them
showing same values:
<broker xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"; brokerName="
pprfdaamq301.ie.id.net" persistent="true" dataDirectory="${activemq.data}">
<!-- Destination specific policies using destination names or
wildcards -->
<destinationPolicy>
<policyMap>
<policyEntries>
<policyEntry queue=">" producerFlowControl="true"
memoryLimit="200mb">
<deadLetterStrategy>
<individualDeadLetterStrategy queuePrefix="DLQ."
useQueueForQueueMessages="true" />
</deadLetterStrategy>
</policyEntry>
<policyEntry topic=">" producerFlowControl="true"
memoryLimit="20mb">
</policyEntry>
</policyEntries>
</policyMap>
</destinationPolicy>
<!-- Use the following to configure how ActiveMQ is exposed in JMX
-->
<managementContext>
<managementContext createConnector="true"/>
</managementContext>
<!--
The store and forward broker networks ActiveMQ will listen to.
We'll leave it empty as duplex network will be configured by
another broker
Take a look at activemq-static_network-broker2.xml for example
-->
<networkConnectors>
<networkConnector uri="static:(tcp://
pprfdaamq300.ie.id.net:61616)"/>
</networkConnectors>
<persistenceAdapter>
<kahaDB directory="${activemq.data}/
pprfdaamq301.ie.id.net/kahadb" enableJournalDiskSyncs="false"
indexWriteBatchSize="10000" indexCacheSize="1000"/>
</persistenceAdapter>
<!-- The maximum amount of space the broker will use before
slowing down producers -->
<systemUsage>
<systemUsage>
<memoryUsage>
<memoryUsage limit="200 mb"/>
</memoryUsage>
<storeUsage>
<storeUsage limit="100 gb" name="foo"/>
</storeUsage>
<tempUsage>
<tempUsage limit="1000 mb"/>
</tempUsage>
</systemUsage>
</systemUsage>
<!-- The transport connectors ActiveMQ will listen to -->
<transportConnectors>
<transportConnector name="openwire" uri="tcp://0.0.0.0:61616"/>
</transportConnectors>
</broker>
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Christian Posta
<christian.po...@gmail.com>wrote:
> DispatchAsync controls how the broker delivers messages to the bridge's
> network (proxy) consumer.
>
> please post the broker configs you're using as well as the
> destination/subscriptions stats (inflight, dispatchcount, enqueue, dequeue,
> etc)?
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanch...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Is it better to set dispathAsync=false on the network of brokers?
> Currently
> > it looks like this?
> >
> > Name<
> >
> http://pprfdaamq300.ie.intuit.net:8161/admin/connections.jsp;jsessionid=ndx7f1ktjogh158jxtqfmr79t#
> > >
> > Network TTL<
> >
> http://pprfdaamq300.ie.intuit.net:8161/admin/connections.jsp;jsessionid=ndx7f1ktjogh158jxtqfmr79t#
> > >
> > Dynamic Only<
> >
> http://pprfdaamq300.ie.intuit.net:8161/admin/connections.jsp;jsessionid=ndx7f1ktjogh158jxtqfmr79t#
> > >
> > Conduit Subscriptions<
> >
> http://pprfdaamq300.ie.intuit.net:8161/admin/connections.jsp;jsessionid=ndx7f1ktjogh158jxtqfmr79t#
> > >
> > Bridge Temps<
> >
> http://pprfdaamq300.ie.intuit.net:8161/admin/connections.jsp;jsessionid=ndx7f1ktjogh158jxtqfmr79t#
> > >
> > Decrease Priorities<
> >
> http://pprfdaamq300.ie.intuit.net:8161/admin/connections.jsp;jsessionid=ndx7f1ktjogh158jxtqfmr79t#
> > >
> > Dispatch Async<
> >
> http://pprfdaamq300.ie.intuit.net:8161/admin/connections.jsp;jsessionid=ndx7f1ktjogh158jxtqfmr79t#
> > >
> > NC 1 false true true false true
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:26 AM, James Green <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > We have observed this when the link between A & B is slow. Probably a
> > > different scenario to the one Mohit is describing though.
> > >
> > > In our case we had a hub behind a shared ADSL link and several spokes
> in
> > > "production land". We would see messages piling up at random on the
> > spokes
> > > until restarts where issued of the brokers. In the end, out of ideas,
> we
> > > shifted the hub to be in the same network at the spokes and messages
> > began
> > > flowing far more reliably.
> > >
> > > James
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4 January 2013 15:10, Christian Posta <christian.po...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > PFC can still affect the network bridge. We should figure out why
> > > messages
> > > > are piling up (unexpectedly??). Do you have a test case that can
> > > reproduce
> > > > this?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Mohit Anchlia <
> mohitanch...@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I think it might be because of this flow control message that I see
> > > > between
> > > > > brokers. Here pprfdaa300 is another broker. But why would this
> happen
> > > > > between brokers though?
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013-01-03 14:44:21,587 | INFO |
> > > > > Usage(default:memory:queue://eventsEndpoint:memory)
> percentUsage=0%,
> > > > > usage=0, limit=20971520,
> > > > > percentUsageMinDelta=1%;Parent:Usage(default:memory)
> > percentUsage=106%,
> > > > > usage=22325599, limit=20971520, percentUsageMinDelta=1%: Usage
> > Manager
> > > > > Memory Limit reached. Producer
> > > > > (ID:pprfdaa300.ind.net-51311-1351809358414-145227:1:1:1) stopped to
> > > > prevent
> > > > > flooding queue://eventsEndpoint. See
> > > > > http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html for more
> info
> > > > > (blocking for: 6822s) | org.apache.activemq.broker.region.Queue |
> > > > ActiveMQ
> > > > > Transport: tcp://pprfdaa300.ind.net/10.145.67.135:61616@41478
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Christian Posta
> > > > > <christian.po...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Can you post the config for the two brokers?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Mohit Anchlia <
> > > mohitanch...@gmail.com
> > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's A <----> B
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Broker A has 2 messages but no consumers
> > > > > > > Broker B has consumers but don't get messages forwarded
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Christian Posta
> > > > > > > <christian.po...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Can you explain how the brokers are set up? A ---> B ? and
> > which
> > > > has
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > messages and which has the consumer?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Mohit Anchlia <
> > > > > mohitanch...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As I understand that if I have network of brokers than the
> > > > messages
> > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > sent to the broker that has active consumers on it. I have
> 2
> > > > > network
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > brokers and one of them has 2 messages and no client
> > consumers
> > > > and
> > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > > one has consumers. I was expecting those 2 messages to be
> > > pulled
> > > > by
> > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > > broker for processing. Could you please help me understand
> > why
> > > > > those
> > > > > > 2
> > > > > > > > > messages wouldn't get processed?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > *Christian Posta*
> > > > > > > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > > > > > > twitter: @christianposta
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Christian Posta*
> > > > > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > > > > twitter: @christianposta
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Christian Posta*
> > > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > > twitter: @christianposta
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Christian Posta*
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> twitter: @christianposta
>
