Yes, failover works on a single instance. I think I mentioned that in my first reply. You don't need to list two brokers. You just need to have the failover: keyword in the connection URI.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016, 7:49 AM Tim Bain <tb...@alumni.duke.edu> wrote: > Yes, the failover transport works in all three dialects (Java, .NET, and > C++). > > On Oct 13, 2016 7:08 AM, "magmasystems" <mad...@quantifisolutions.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks guys. As I mentioned, the devs tend to do stuff on their laptops > > without running multiple instances of ActiveMQ. They basically go to the > > ActiveMQ directory, run the activemq.bat file, do some debugging, and > then > > CTRL+C out of ActiveMQ. If there are any patterns or tricks we could use > to > > get automatic failover out of a single instance, I would love to know > about > > it. Could you do something like: > > > > failover:(tcp://localhost:61616,tcp://remotehost:61616) > > > > Hmmmm ... according to > > http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html, you should > > be > > able to. But, will that work with ActiveMQ NMS? > > > > -marc > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > > nabble.com/ActiveMQ-NMS-and-Failure-Recovery-tp4717704p4717859.html > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
