Ok, just to be clear, we define the virtual topic statically (the one used by
the producer), not the individual consumer queues. I hope it's the former
because client queues for virtual topics are named using "app-version"
convention for grouping related consumers; we can't define those names
statically as they're too volatile. Will report back on this.
View this message in context:
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.