BTW, do you have consumers consuming directly from the virtual topic, or only via queues? If you have no topic consumers, I believe you can just remove your excludedDestinations entry and everything will work as intended. As I understand it, the problems only occur when you have a mix of queue and topic consumers.
On Oct 15, 2016 6:53 PM, "Tim Bain" <tb...@alumni.duke.edu> wrote: > Correct, statically include the topics, not the queues. > > On Oct 15, 2016 9:27 AM, "Devlin" <rbasmaj...@ofiglobal.com> wrote: > >> Ok, just to be clear, we define the virtual topic statically (the one >> used by >> the producer), not the individual consumer queues. I hope it's the former >> because client queues for virtual topics are named using "app-version" >> convention for grouping related consumers; we can't define those names >> statically as they're too volatile. Will report back on this. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nab >> ble.com/Virtual-topics-custom-prefix-limitations-tp4717481p4717968.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >
