Am 29.08.2013 um 16:11 schrieb Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]>:
> since the whole Snowden/NSA sadness started I find my thoughts returning
> to views every so often, and why gmail's views work well while aox'
> views are not usable.
>
> I've known they aren't usable for a while, but not been able to find out
> why. After all, they can do everything.
>
> But maybe it's simple: They're just too flexible. It seems much easier
> to do someting useful if views can be restricted to be like in gmail:
> "Archive contains all the threads in in mailbox x where at least one
> message has the archived flag", "Inbox contains all the messages in
> mailbox x where at least one message does not have the seen flag", etc.
>
> Correct me if I am wrong. PLEASE correct me if I am wrong. Are any of
> you actually using views and getting something useful out of them?
No, not really. Complexity often keeps users away from a feature. (-;
While we are talking about NSA, are you considering implementing Diffie–Hellman
key exchange?
I just did
openssl s_client -starttls imap -connect timap4.lrau.net:imap
and got
Cipher : CAMELLIA256-SHA
while max SMTP server gives
Cipher : DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
Axel
---
PGP-Key:29E99DD6 ☀ +49 151 2300 9283 ☀ computing @ chaos claudius
