Peter Fjelsten wrote:
> Maybe you should try Opera5 yourself to size up the competition...? :)
Windows *grumble*
[hours later...]
OK, I checked it out. Nice app. But I still don't see what you are
talking about. You did see Tasks|Tools|Privacy|Cookie Manager, not?
> IMHO, it is far from so now. Maybe because it's only in the address
> field that one knows that one is at either .COM or .ORG.
Any suggestions? (No, I won't replace "Beonex" with "Beonex.com" and
"Beonex.org" in the heading section.)
The difference (at the moment) is that .org is the non-profit stuff and
.com is for-profit and general. Should I move the latter to .net (e.g.
move beonex.com/communicator to beonex.net/communicator)?* Should I drop
the distinction completely? Leave as-is? Is there a way to make it clearer?
The rational: People in the free software scene are wary of .coms. But I
*need* a user-, and possibly even a developer-, community. I cannot
offer the free support I do at the moment at this list for much longer -
I hardly get to something else.
*Why didn't I think of that earlier? After all, we do provide internet
infrastructure. Or will 3 different domains confuse people even more?
> That's not what I mean. I wrote "lexicography" to indicate that I'm
> not after the hyperbole but terms normal people can understand.
ic. But what level of expertise can I expect? Do people know, what HTML
or POP3 is? Did Netscape hit the right level (if you disregard the
hyperbole)?
> I am nowhere at level to understand all this Dev-section stuff.
Are you refering to beonex.org/dev or beonex.com/dev? You don't have to
understand the former. If you don't understand the latter, I probably
made a mistake.
