> On Oct 2, 2014, at 12:57 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Carlos Reátegui <create...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Daan, >> Any chance you got to look at this? I am still confused why for a basic >> network with no vlans the code is expecting a uri for a vlan. >> thanks > > It is a known issue, can you do your setup with specifying a vlan? I > suspect this being the issue. It won't use the vlan but it needs a value.
Where do I do that? > Needs fixing but I think it will work with this work around. I am not sure > what the most solid fix would be and that would be more a discussion for > dev@... > > You could think of inserting a default value when doing basic networking or > a check on networking type when creating the router/instances. Both seem > quirky, though. > > regards, > -- > Daan
