On 02/13/2018 11:46 AM, Maxim wrote:
> 12.02.2018 19:31, Digimer пишет:
>> Without fencing, all bets are off. Please enable it and see if the
> > issue remains
> Seems, i know [in theory] about the fencing ability and its importance
> (although I've never configured it so far).
> But i don't undestand how it would help in the situtions of the hard
Actually in 2 ways:
- you are strongly advised to use fencing - and thus the base of users using
fencing is much higher and strange/unexpected behavior is thus much
more likely with the less tested setups without fencing
- fencing helps you turning the 'maybe the node is down - it doesn't respond
within x milli-seconds' into certainty that your node is dead and won't
interfere with the rest of the cluster
>> Changing EL6 to corosync 2 pushes further into uncharted waters. EL6
> > should be using the cman pluging with corosync 1. May I ask why you
> > don't use EL7 if you want such a recent stack?
> For historical reasons. Let's say so. I've another software that built
> for RHEL 6 like OS and have to be installed on the cluster node.
> EL 7 stack is already not so recent, but it's one the most stable and
> least vulnearable, i suppose. And i understand the risks.
> I will update pcs to the latest version when i find a bit of free time.
> Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf