Hi Drew, Effectively, I forgot to indicate my os, here is that corrected:
OS: Sidux Eros (Debian Linux) kernel:2.6.24-2.6.24.4.slh.4-sidux-686 OOo: 2.4 (2.4.0-3+b1) I don't know if OOo is standard or changed by the sidux team. Anyway, the files are located in /user/lib/openoffice.org/program. After having backed-up the two original files, I renamed the patches in that directory. Unhappily, OObase suddently stops offering to restore the document when I try to open the form with the listboxes to refresh. Doing this only with libdba680li.so.1.1 doesn't help in the refresh problem but OObase works. Using libfrm680li.so.1.1 only also makes OObase suddently close even if I open a simple form without the refresh instruction in its macros. What I'll try to do: -Keep the 2.4 for a future upgrade fixing this issue. -Try to lounch another version with something like chroot (?). Andrew Jensen-2 wrote: > > Hi Eirc, > > They are replacement files for the distribution files of the same name. > > To expand on Frank's admonitions however. If you don't have the > standard distribution it is likely you will have a functioning > installation of office after the replacement. > > You do not mention which OS you are running OOo under so I will pass > on my experience on this. Currently I have 2 PC's running linux here - > 1 Kubuntu 64bit and on this I run the ubuntu distro of OOo ( usually > ), the second Kubuntu 32bit and I run the standard OO.o dirtro. > > On the 64bit machine using the Ubuntu distribution the files are > located where you show, /user/lib/openoffice.org/program but some file > names are actually changed. libdba680li.so is named libdba680lx.so - > replacing this file with the patched file would guarantee a > non-functioning office here. > > While on the 32bit machine, using a vanilla OO.o installation > replacement for the distribution version, the location changed. This > installation is located at /opt/openoffice.org2.4/program. Replacing > the files with the patched versions worked without a problem. > > Even so, for both this Linux machine and my XP machine I renamed the > original files first and then added the patched files, so that I could > undue the change easily. > > I hope that helps > > Drew > > On 4/10/08, RicandeRhino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Zoltán, >> >> >> For this, I prepared two archives, containing modified libraries for >> >> Windows respectively Linux. I encourage you to try out those, if and >> >> only if you want to check whether the upcoming 2.4.1 is likely to >> >> resolve your list box related issues. >> > >> > Where we could find these archives? >> >> Argh. Sorry, I need a coffee, it seems. >> >> Here they are: >> http://dba.openoffice.org/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=547&expandFolder=547&folderID=0 >> >> Ciao >> Frank >> >> Hello, >> >> I found the two files and I don't risk a lot installing them on my 2nd >> machine. >> But how to install them? >> In place of /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libdba680li.so? ln them or just >> at >> the same place? >> >> Thanks >> Eric >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/list-boxes-in-OOo-2.4-....-tp16581656p16602095.html >> Sent from the openoffice - dba users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/list-boxes-in-OOo-2.4-....-tp16581656p16618444.html Sent from the openoffice - dba users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
