2013/9/10 John Marino <[email protected]>: > On 9/10/2013 00:31, Outback Dingo wrote: >> >> actually i mentiioned it weeks ago........... easier to integrate, > > Integrate into the BSD codebase? Where is the analysis to prove that > assertion? > >> easier to manage, > > Easier than what? Is there a survey or analysis to support that it is > easier than (everything else)? > > easier to port, > > This is same as integrate. All I say is a statement from you that this > is the case. Do you have anything else to support that it is easier to > port launchd than SMF or systemd to BSD? (what the hell, throw in > "upgrading" rcng too) > > and launchd isnt Linux.... its from BSD > > Oh, mac. I was getting confused with Ubuntu's upstart. (Sorry, my bad) > Still, calling launchd "BSD" is generous. Has it been actually ported > to anything else?
A port to FreeBSD was done during a summer of code https://wiki.freebsd.org/launchd > >> and yes, a study was done 4 years ago by a commercial entity that >> actually did do the work for their benefit. > > So it won't be a problem to provide the reference or link to it? > > John
