On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:19 AM, joris dedieu <[email protected]>wrote:
> 2013/9/10 John Marino <[email protected]>: > > On 9/10/2013 00:31, Outback Dingo wrote: > >> > >> actually i mentiioned it weeks ago........... easier to integrate, > > > > Integrate into the BSD codebase? Where is the analysis to prove that > > assertion? > > > >> easier to manage, > > > > Easier than what? Is there a survey or analysis to support that it is > > easier than (everything else)? > > > > easier to port, > > > > This is same as integrate. All I say is a statement from you that this > > is the case. Do you have anything else to support that it is easier to > > port launchd than SMF or systemd to BSD? (what the hell, throw in > > "upgrading" rcng too) > > > > and launchd isnt Linux.... its from BSD > > > > Oh, mac. I was getting confused with Ubuntu's upstart. (Sorry, my bad) > > Still, calling launchd "BSD" is generous. Has it been actually ported > > to anything else? > > A port to FreeBSD was done during a summer of code > https://wiki.freebsd.org/launchd > > > yeah, but its pretty incomplete.... so we had finished it, though it was like i said for a commercial entity. be nice to see it redone and released > >> and yes, a study was done 4 years ago by a commercial entity that > >> actually did do the work for their benefit. > > > > So it won't be a problem to provide the reference or link to it? > > > > John >
