On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 07:24:45AM +1000, Petr Janda wrote: > I also think it's silly the best argument people can come up against SMF > is "It's made by Sun." or "It uses XML, which is bad because I don't > understand it".
Apparently, the main reason against SMF itself was that it doesn't provide much over any other init system. In fact I can't imagine any task I can accomplish with SMF that I can't with the default OpenBSD install. Thus, if SMF didn't come with XML, it would be merely useless tinkering; as long as it forces XML, it is worse. -- Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
