I use both ./tmp and ./tmp/** . But with status the tmp directory will say that is changed. Only the directory (I suppose last modification) not the content. But the first ignore should not sai to ignore tmp?
I because tmp is already in the svn repository? 2009/8/22 Davide <[email protected]>: > Thanks Philipp, > > but what about ./proc and ./proc/** > > In the first case if proc is a directory and > is ignored, are the content ignored too? > > Are not equivalent this two ignore patterns? > > 2009/8/20 Philipp Marek <[email protected]>: >> Hello Davide, >> >>> What is the difference between >>> >>> ./proc >> Ignores an entry "proc" on the top of the working copy >> >>> and >>> >>> /proc >> Ignores the directory /proc, if / is a working copy. >> >> The biggest difference here is for deeper levels: >> >> /etc/**.dpkg-old >> vs. >> ./etc/**.dpkg-old >> >> The latter one would ignore /usr/local/etc/x.dpkg-old, if /usr/local/etc is >> the working >> copy; the first one would match, regardless if the wc is /etc or /. >> >>> and >>> >>> ./proc/** or /proc/** >> Mostly the same as above. >> With >> /proc >> the directory is ignored, with >> /proc/** >> only the contents. >> >> That makes a difference mostly on restore - with /proc you'd have to make >> the mount >> point yourself. >> >> http://doc.fsvs-software.org/doxygen-gif/group__ignpat.html >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Phil >> -- >> Versioning your /etc, /home or even your whole installation? >> Try fsvs (fsvs.tigris.org)! >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------ http://fsvs.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=3928&dsMessageId=2386261 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
