So maybe I should remove tmp from the repository? But I make this, the if I make a checkout on a empty disk, then the tmp does not exist and the system maybe does not start!
2009/8/22 Davide <[email protected]>: > I use both ./tmp and ./tmp/** . But > with status the tmp directory will say > that is changed. Only the directory > (I suppose last modification) > not the content. But the first ignore should > not sai to ignore tmp? > > I because tmp is already in the svn repository? > > > 2009/8/22 Davide <[email protected]>: >> Thanks Philipp, >> >> but what about ./proc and ./proc/** >> >> In the first case if proc is a directory and >> is ignored, are the content ignored too? >> >> Are not equivalent this two ignore patterns? >> >> 2009/8/20 Philipp Marek <[email protected]>: >>> Hello Davide, >>> >>>> What is the difference between >>>> >>>> ./proc >>> Ignores an entry "proc" on the top of the working copy >>> >>>> and >>>> >>>> /proc >>> Ignores the directory /proc, if / is a working copy. >>> >>> The biggest difference here is for deeper levels: >>> >>> /etc/**.dpkg-old >>> vs. >>> ./etc/**.dpkg-old >>> >>> The latter one would ignore /usr/local/etc/x.dpkg-old, if /usr/local/etc is >>> the working >>> copy; the first one would match, regardless if the wc is /etc or /. >>> >>>> and >>>> >>>> ./proc/** or /proc/** >>> Mostly the same as above. >>> With >>> /proc >>> the directory is ignored, with >>> /proc/** >>> only the contents. >>> >>> That makes a difference mostly on restore - with /proc you'd have to make >>> the mount >>> point yourself. >>> >>> http://doc.fsvs-software.org/doxygen-gif/group__ignpat.html >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Phil >>> -- >>> Versioning your /etc, /home or even your whole installation? >>> Try fsvs (fsvs.tigris.org)! >>> >>> >> > ------------------------------------------------------ http://fsvs.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=3928&dsMessageId=2386263 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
