On 2011-03-29 14:39, Michel Gagnon wrote:
> Le 2011-03-28 15:03, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions a écrit :
>> On 03/28/2011 02:41 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>> I had this same thing. The document font was arial on both machines.
>>> But I found the arial fonts were not the same. I copied the arial
>>> font from the first machine to the second machine (deleting and
>>> replacing the font) and the layout was then the same.
>>>
>>> steve
>> <snip>
>>
>> I never heard of that issue. Maybe the TTF vs. OTF fonts would make a
>> difference, but I use TTF for all my fonts if I have it in that
>> format. I do make sure that any of my systems have the same list of
>> fonts installed.
>
> It is indeed an issue. On my XP, I have Arial v.3.0, whereas on my
> Windows 7, I have Arial 5.06. From what I see, they are identical,
> except v.5 has better kerning pairs with accented letters ("Téléphone"
> doesn't look as bad) and more special letters. But other less basic
> fonts have been fine-tuned over the years, with sometimes unexpected
> results.
> Also a bug was corrected between OOo 3.2 and LO 3.3: previously, line
> spacing at less than 100% was not rendered correctly. So I gained 1-2
> lines per page on many documents.
>
I gained 1-2 lines per page between Arial on my mac and Arial on my
Suse. Really mucked up a 40 page manual with copious diagrams.-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
