JOE CONNER wrote: > > I have OOo 3.3.0 on my notebook (xnumbers runs great), and LO 3.4.3 on > my desktop (xnumbers has some functioning formula, and some #NAME) so > there has been some regression after LO forked from OOo. >
Thanks. I will try OOo 3.3.0 Actually the regression happened before the fork because it didn't work in OOo 3.4 Beta either, as I mentioned ;) Unfortunately since development for xnumbers stopped 3 years ago, the chances that it will work in future versions of LO seems rather slim... -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LOcalc-shows-an-inaccurate-output-when-use-cells-autofill-function-tp3397081p3401101.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
