On 10/6/2011 2:11 PM, Pedro [via Document Foundation Mail Archive] wrote:
JOE CONNER wrote:
I have OOo 3.3.0 on my notebook (xnumbers runs great), and LO
3.4.3 on
my desktop (xnumbers has some functioning formula, and some #NAME) so
there has been some regression after LO forked from OOo.
Thanks. I will try OOo 3.3.0
Actually the regression happened before the fork because it didn't
work in OOo 3.4 Beta either, as I mentioned ;)
Unfortunately since development for xnumbers stopped 3 years ago, the
chances that it will work in future versions of LO seems rather slim...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you suggesting that LO forked from OOo 3.4.x rather than OOo 3.3.x?
If so, then the regression is with OOo. That is no reason however for
LO to follow suit.
Joe
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
