Hi :)
Top posting and leaving the thread intact allows a person that is new to the 
thread or can't quite remember context, to gain the full context of the later 
replies.  It also allows people to only read the last message without having to 
scroll or wade through tons of stuff from previous messages or try to pick out 
other emails that have the same subject-line in order to try to make sense of 
this one.  It neatly achieves both choices without requiring the receiver to do 
anything other than scroll or not even scroll if they already remember roughly 
what the thread is about.  If someone reads the latest message and then 
suddenly realises that they don't seem to know the context after all then they 
can choose to quickly scroll down and hopefully spot a message that does remind 
them.  It's the way that almost all emailing works in almost every office, it's 
the way phones and hand-helds are set-up, it's the way many people on the 
accessibility list prefer as
 they can simply stop the screen-reader once they have got the gist of the 
reply.  

There was a beautiful example earlier where i replied to the message as it was 
written but then got accused of being off-topic because the alleged topic had 
been edited out.  Note that the criticism was on-list just to make sure that 
anyone new to the list becomes very aware that they are likely to be publicly 
humiliated if they do something slightly wrong.  Imagine queuing to buy 
something in a shop and the person at the counter punches the customer in front 
of you.  Would you continue to wait in line or leave and perhaps use a 
different store?  

Note also that top-posters on this list have never asked bottom-posters to post 
at the top.  It has always been bottom-posters arrogantly demanding that people 
conform to their own obtuse way of doing things.  I did try bottom-posting a 
few times and instead of people saying thanks they just further abused me, 
again only publicly, that i hadn't done something quite right.  If there had 
been anything approaching politeness or a gentle nudge in the right direction 
then i might have tried again but i have no interest in allowing bullies to 
intimidate me or anyone else.  

'Regards' from
Tom :)



--- On Wed, 22/2/12, Mirosław Zalewski <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Mirosław Zalewski <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Top posting
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, 22 February, 2012, 19:41

On 22/02/2012 at 20:19, Tom Davies <[email protected]> wrote:

> Most people and especially those that are new to the lists will
> top-post because that is what they are most familiar with. 

Perhaps you have encountered that somewhere:

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

In my entire life I have never seen any mailing list or Usenet group with so 
much top-posting and unneeded quotes as this one. Since this is user support 
group, it should be just ignored in most cases (we want to help user, not 
bully them). But I think that people who often write to group should adapt to 
basic mailing etiquette. It isn't that hard, really.
-- 
Best regards
Mirosław Zalewski

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to