Le 31/05/12 14:59, Tom Davies a écrit : Hi Tom,
> Why can't they just say things like "A LOT faster"?? Why drag in numbers > that are likely to be proven wrong in certain/all cases? Well, probably because the cynic in me knows that someone in the AOO camp released a statement about AOO 3.4 essentially saying that it was much faster (by a factor of x, y, z) than LO, and both projects seem to be content to knock each other about at the slightest occasion (sighs in disbelief). I have personally always hated the spin that this project has attempted to put on things to make it sound more attractive than the "competition" - it was the same thing while OOo was ongoing. Like Andreas, I generally tend to ignore announcements like that and prefer factual analysis, but how often is software tested and statistically significant results given ? errmm.... On my Linux box, with less than one Gig of ram and an old 5400 rpm harddisk, everything is slow !!!! ;-) On my Macbook, it depends. So basically, YMMV - your mileage may vary. Alex -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
