Jay, Yes, user confusion and frustrated expectations do seem to be risks.
I think the bigger problem will be with Windows RT systems, where Windows 7/8 and earlier desktop applications do not run at all. On Windows 8 systems, having both MX applications and desktop applications may or may not be a difficulty for users. We'll have to see. Software producers that have both a desktop and an MX version will need to be careful about how things work when both are installed on a Windows 8 machine. There are already examples of that with Internet Explorer, OneNote, Skype, SkyDrive, and Netflix. That's something to think about for LibreOffice too. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Jay Lozier [mailto:jsloz...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 13:59 To: dennis.hamil...@acm.org Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: Re: Windows 8 Compatibility (was RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: 0xc0000005 error in RPCRT4.dll from soffice.bin) On 12/14/2012 04:39 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Jay, I agree. > > There are two kinds of compatibility for Windows 8. > > First, desktop compatibility is essentially the same as for Windows 7. There > is more room for gradual upgrade to integrate more smoothly, including on x64 > machines with Atom processors, solid-state drives, and storage in the cloud. > I think UX features will also adjust and improve, but that will be relatively > gradual. > > The second kind of compatibility is determined by whether or not an > application is distributed via the Windows Store. As far as I know, that's > reserved for MX applications that run on either Windows 8 or Windows RT. I > also believe that is the only way a consumer can obtain MX applications that > they didn't write themselves. (There are apparently ways for Enterprises to > create something like their own stores.) > > So yes, there are two levels of capability. The productivity software such > as LibreOffice is going to be running on the desktop for a long time. There > is a great deal to figure out to see how to deploy on MX successfully. In a > way, the same issues arise for Android and iOS as targets for the desktop > productivity software that we've been relying upon. > > - Dennis Dennis, The problem then is properly explaining to Win8 users what they should expect in terms of compatibility. But even so, I fear a large number of users will not either pay attention to the vendor statements or be confused by the MS advertising and believe that all software will work with the new UI like the advertised apps. It probably will be a lesser problem with FOSS projects because a higher portion of the user base is more technically astute. If we are having this discussion then the majority of users will be confused by this issue. The scenario, IMHO, is who will the user blame: MS or the software vendor? IMHO, I think the compatibility definition is caused by MS being schizophrenic with the OS and trying to make work on tablets/phones and desktops the same way. Jay [ ... ] -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
