Hi :) Hmmm, what worries me is "MS" and "Standards" in the same sentence. Haven't we already learned, many times over, that MS's idea of open = closed standards and interoperable = only works once on one system or at least that seems to be the way it has always worked out historically.
So while it looks good i am fairly convinced there is a trap here somewhere even if i can't see it and don't already know about it. An OpenSource equivalent that uses the alleged 'standard' would be much more comforting. Regards from Tom :) >________________________________ > From: Adam Tauno Williams <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Friday, 15 February 2013, 12:56 >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Share-point? > >On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 11:28 -0600, anne-ology wrote: >> Content Management System ;-) ... LAN ;-) ... a wiki ;-) ??? >> as to these - I haven't a clue; I'll continue to stick with the >> KISs method ;-) > >What is simple about Content Management? Nothing. > >> But if we each sign up to use DropBox, we can each end up with 6Gb >> of free space to use as we wish in sharing documents - > >And DropBox is a single-vendor proprietary service. Loving these >services and bashing Microsoft in the same e-mail is nonsensical. > >> and MsFt does not have any control over this :-) > >CMIS IS A STANDARD!!! MsFt has no 'control' over it. It is even a >standard that uses REST and Atom publishing... how is that a *BAD* >thing??? > >I just started looking into CMIS and it seems like a "*FINALLY!*" thing >to me. We've needed a standard like this for ages. > > -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
